Muhammad isa ahdiatullah
2011010095
we will see changes in the natural environment of villages and cities. In the village the land is still wide for plantations, agriculture, livestock so it is still beautiful and beautiful. The air is still natural and fresh without a mixture of harmful chemicals, making the village comfortable and safe. Even to find clean water sources, it is still abundant, usually clean water is taken from ground water by making wells. That way, the natural ecosystem is well preserved and nature returns to providing results to the village community. Second, in terms of social life in the village, there are still kinship or association, close and intimate relationships. Residents flocked to help each other, manifested by mutual cooperation during community service when someone was in trouble. In contrast to life in a city that is opposite to petembayan, individuals are indifferent to each other. More precisely, individualism, namely completing a job yourself, not needing neighbors or the environment, preferring to use paid services. Once there is an advantage it is also that no one asks and asks for time, so that it does not interfere with the work that is being done. Urban orangutans are always busy with their work and their own affairs, so they are less sensitive to their social environment. Third, the economic field has various ways of meeting human needs. In the village the fulfillment of natural needs, for example through agriculture, plantations and animal husbandry. If the villagers do good for nature, then nature will generate benefits for humans on the contrary. Far from it, jobs in cities are industries in factories that use machines or heavy equipment to produce products. But in his work it also mixes with chemicals that create a bad environment for humans and the human environment. In terms of wages, jobs in cities earn higher wages, but the price of basic necessities is more expensive in cities than in villages.